Why Most Developers Waste Claude Code’s Potential

I’ve watched too many developers fire up Claude Code, ask it to build something, and then spend hours fixing the mess it creates. The problem isn’t the AI—it’s that you’re using default settings optimized for general assistance, not your specific development workflow.

Claude Code reads a CLAUDE.md file in your home directory (.claude/CLAUDE.md) and treats those instructions as gospel. This isn’t prompt engineering—it’s setting foundational rules that apply to every interaction. Get this right once, and you never have to correct the same mistakes again.

The Rules That Actually Matter

Here’s what I put in my global CLAUDE.md file. Every rule exists because I got burned by not having it.

Type System Enforcement

1
2

use python 3.11+ style types like int, str, list, dict, etc
use dataclass/typeddict instead of pydantic

Modern Python type hints are built-in and fast. Claude Code loves to reach for Pydantic because it’s popular, but unless you’re building an API that needs validation, you’re adding dependency weight for no reason. TypedDict and dataclass give you 90% of the value with zero external dependencies.

Import Hygiene

1

Use absolute imports. Avoid relative imports except within the same module.

Relative imports break the moment you refactor or move files. Absolute imports are explicit and searchable. This rule has saved me countless debugging sessions tracking down import errors.

Testing Structure That Scales

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11

### Testing Approach

- Use table-driven tests when possible
- Use from inline_snapshot import snapshot, assert something() == snapshot(28620972) where possible
- Always test error paths and edge cases
- Use test structure:
tests/
  __init__.py
  integration/
  system/
  unit/

The test structure isn’t just organization—it’s about making it obvious what kind of test you’re writing. Unit tests for functions, integration tests for components working together, system tests for the full stack. Claude Code understands this hierarchy and places new tests correctly.

The inline_snapshot instruction is my secret weapon. Instead of manually writing expected values, you write the assertion with an empty snapshot, run the test, and inline_snapshot captures the actual output. You review the snapshot once, and it becomes your regression test. Massive time saver.

The Anti-Patterns

1
2
3
4
5

don't use argparse
Never use emojis.
Never add Claude as a commit author.
Never create .md files unless explicitly instructed.
minimize docstrings

These are the “stop doing that” rules:

• argparse: It’s verbose and a pain to test. I prefer simpler CLI parsing or just environment variables.
• emojis: They break in logs, terminals, and CI/CD output. Hard pass.
• Claude as co-author: It’s an AI assistant, not a contributor. I wrote the code, even if Claude generated the first draft.
• .md files: Claude loves to create documentation for everything. I only want docs when I explicitly ask.
• docstrings: Most functions are self-documenting with good names and type hints. Skip the boilerplate.

The One Rule That Changes Everything

1

simple solution for a complex problem

This single line does more than any other rule in my config. Without it, Claude Code will over-engineer solutions with plugins, factories, dependency injection, and abstractions you don’t need. With it, you get straightforward code that solves the actual problem.

AI models are trained on open source code, which tends toward the overengineered side. Explicitly telling Claude to keep it simple counteracts that bias.

How to Structure Your CLAUDE.md

1
2

mkdir -p ~/.claude
touch ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11

# Python Development Standards

## Type System
use python 3.11+ style types like int, str, list, dict, etc
use dataclass/typeddict instead of pydantic

## Code Style
Use absolute imports. Avoid relative imports except within the same module.
Never use emojis.
minimize docstrings
simple solution for a complex problem

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11

### Testing Approach

- Use table-driven tests when possible
- Use from inline_snapshot import snapshot for regression tests
- Always test error paths and edge cases
- Use test structure:
tests/
  __init__.py
  integration/
  system/
  unit/

1
2
3
4
5

# Project-Specific Rules

don't refactor legacy/database.py
use PostgreSQL for all database operations
API responses must include request_id field

The Skills You Actually Need

Beyond rules, Claude Code supports custom skills—basically reusable workflows triggered by slash commands. I keep mine minimal:

• /commit: Stages changes and creates a commit with a conventional commit message
• /test: Runs the test suite and reports failures
• /deploy: Project-specific deployment workflow

The key is not to go overboard. Skills are useful for common workflows you repeat daily, not one-off tasks. If you find yourself creating a skill you’ll use once, you’re over-automating.

When Rules Break Down

This configuration philosophy works great for greenfield projects and codebases you control. It breaks down when:

Working with established codebases: If the project already uses Pydantic everywhere, fighting that in CLAUDE.md just creates inconsistency. Adapt your rules to match existing patterns.

Polyglot projects: Global rules optimized for Python will confuse Claude when you’re working in JavaScript. Use project-specific CLAUDE.md files to handle multi-language repos.

Team projects with different standards: Your personal CLAUDE.md shouldn’t override team conventions. Either align your rules with the team’s style guide or keep conflicting rules minimal.

The Testing Pattern That Changed My Workflow

The inline_snapshot approach deserves special attention because it’s not obvious how powerful it is until you use it:

1
2
3

def test_user_serialization():
    user = User(name="Alice", email="alice@example.com")
    assert serialize_user(user) == snapshot()

First run generates:

1
2
3

def test_user_serialization():
    user = User(name="Alice", email="alice@example.com")
    assert serialize_user(user) == snapshot({"name": "Alice", "email": "alice@example.com"})

You review the snapshot, and if it’s correct, the test is done. Future changes that break serialization get caught immediately.

This works brilliantly with Claude Code because it can generate the test skeleton, you run it once, and the snapshot becomes the contract. No more manually constructing expected dictionaries or JSON strings.

FAQ

Why This Configuration Philosophy Works

The core insight is that AI coding assistants work best with explicit constraints. Without rules, Claude Code optimizes for generality—it tries to write code that works for everyone, which means it’s not optimized for you.

With the right CLAUDE.md setup, you’re teaching Claude your development philosophy once. Every interaction after that builds on those foundations. The AI stops suggesting patterns you don’t use and starts reinforcing the patterns you do.

This isn’t about replacing your judgment with rules. It’s about eliminating the repetitive corrections that waste time and breaking your flow. The rules handle the obvious stuff—type hints, import style, test structure—so you can focus on the actual problem you’re solving.

Conclusion

The best Claude Code setup is one that disappears. You shouldn’t be thinking about configuration or fighting with the AI’s suggestions. Get your CLAUDE.md file right, and the tool becomes an extension of your development process instead of something you have to constantly correct. That’s when the productivity gains actually show up.